This is Google's cache of http://911lies.org/missiles.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Sep 22, 2010 02:26:04 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http 911lies org missiles html  

  

HOME
FAKE BIN LADEN
PENTAGON FRAUD
FAMILIES DEMANDS

WTC DEMOLITION
MISSILE DAMAGE
VIEW PETITION
911 STORE
FAKE CELL CALLS
GOV SEEDS
LINKS / GOOGLE VIDEO
DONATE
ABOUT US
Post Comment

Missile Damage To Pentagon Obvious

There are some government seeded conspiracy nuts going around talking about 'No planes' or 'CGI' planes related to WTC Incident.
This is orchestrated by the government to devalue any alternate theory other than the official story. 

Before we even knew there was a debate over plane / no-planes, I just by chance, wrote an email to one of the 'CGI-Plane' idiots.


I simply said; "As a seeker of truth, don't you feel it would be more logical to focus on 'low-tech' evidence, that is more easily understood, and more likely to be looked at with an open mind?

Thinking I was going to receive a eager reply from a fellow truth-seeker, I was shocked when I was bombarded with aspersions and anger.
(all of which I believe is staged now)

I had no idea, that there were some people who basically attacked truth seekers who did not accept their version of events 100%.

Logic would dictate, that if these people actually believed in 'CGI-PLANE' (or no-plane theories) they would still concentrate on 'low-tech' more widely understandable evidence, to first engage people, and gain a respect, etc... so that a forum could be opened with a public, willing to consider many aspects. In short, convince them first, of definite inconsistencies, then debate what possibilities were left.

So, I have come to the conclusion, that these nasty, vocal, 'no-plane' theory people are simply government ploys to reduce the believability of any theory, other than the 911 commission lie.

Nothing is logical about their bullshit. If they TRULY believed in CGI, or 'no-plane' it would seem their #1 priority would be to convince people 911 was an inside job, not that their particular theory is correct, and anything else is wrong.

I wrote this one guy a nice email talking about 'low-tech' easily understandable proof of 911 commission fraud, and he went ballistic, said we are enemies, and his only concern was 'plane huggers' ...seemingly disregarding whether the public believes something is wrong with the official story. To me, they cannot be anything but government seeds designed to make any alternative theory other than the official story, appear as a 'whack-job' theories.

911Lies does not care (for the moment) to speculate on EXACTLY what happened, we first want to confirm that the official story COULD NOT HAVE happened.

The precision symmetrical implosion of 3 buildings could never result from any series of events like planes hitting the towers, and jet-fuel burning.


GET YOUR 911 BUMPER STICKERS NOW!