This is Google's cache of It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Oct 7, 2010 22:01:05 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
Articles Of Research By 911 Activist Dick Eastman

Articles & Research By Dick Eastman

Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover
on 9/11 inside job. PDF Print E-mail
Written by Gibbwake

Meet Torin Wolf. He has a broad and varied background as a US Army Combat Nurse during Operation Iraqi Freedom,....

...building construction contractor, certified structural welder,
certified asbestos and hazardous materials worker, experienced
demolitions expert, teacher, radio show host, and well studied 9/11 truth activist. Torin knows how to put a building up, and bring the same building down in its own footprint. Torin's free presentation, "Taking the Red Pill" was hosted by Brave New Books on 1904 Guadalupe in Austin last Saturday, June 23rd at 7 pm.

Torin is proud of his native Cherokee heritage and his mother is the Band Historian of the White River Band Cherokee from the central United States. Since he received his GED at age 14, saying he is a smart guy is putting it lightly. For over 12 years he worked as a hazardous materials contractor specializing in asbestos abatement and
concrete construction sampling. Add to his resume the fact that he designed and implemented well over 100 controlled demolitions. He was not just helping at a lower level in the demolitions - he was the guy responsible for calling the shots. Afterwards, he became a certified  structural steel welder and worked in heavy and mega construction for over 5 years in locations around the world including several skyscrapers.

Ironically, Torin signed his papers to join the army on September
11th, 2000. He knew something was wrong with the official 9/11 story when his army handlers took his squad into a room just in time to watch the buildings collapse. With his demolitions experience, he immediately knew those towers could not have fallen like that without explosives. He went on to serve "with honor and distinction" with the 21st Combat Support Hospital in Mosul, Iraq during the first part of Operation Iraqi Freedom and earned the Bronze Star with V device for valor in combat.

While saving over 120 lives, Torin earned the Combat Medical Badge by providing medical care to US, allied, enemy soldiers, and civilians under combat conditions. Torin's arms display Samoan life saving tattoos, each line and symbol representing a group of lives saved. The army would like you to think he wasn't in Iraq, but unfortunately for them, Torin appears in a recent documentary filmed there. A true hero helping save lives in the middle east, Torin can be seen in section 4 of a PBS documentary called "Life and Death in the War Zone."

With Torins impressive list of qualifications, his unwavering voice
holds a power that shatters the lies of 9/11 sold to us by the
government and mainstream media, "The official story we've been told about 9/11 is absolutely, physically impossible."

Those words are not just backed up with his qualifications because his presentation goes through the hard physics as well. The presentation starts out with a serious warning that reminds us the state our country is in after the false flag attack and ensuing tyrannical hijacking of the government on that September morning. A hijacking not by Bin Laden, not by Al Qeada, but by a group of tyrants that orchestrated and benefited from 9/11. "Unless you want to be charged as a terrorist, I suggest you leave the room now. This is technically seditious material and you can be charged under section 802 of the Patriot Act just for being here."

This upsets a few people near the front row. Everyone looks around to see if that will scare anyone off but luckily no one leaves and the presentation continues. The bookstore is now filled with former American citizens, now terrorists, simply because they want to learn the truth of what happened on 9/11. If you think the patriot act only applies to foreigners or dehumanized Muslims with brown skin, you are
very wrong. Torin rubs the effect in even more, "We [American
citizens] don't even have to be charged – foreigners do." Then tells us that the patriot act was written prior to 9/11, "This is admitted." Also admitted is the fact that the patriot act has been used to come after American citizens over eight hundred times.

The presentation moves on and goes through some of the just plain crazy theories of why the towers fell, such as space beams, holograms, missiles, orbs, pterodactyls, etc., and easily debunks them. Torin then adds, "There is evidence most of these are put out by the government as disinfo." Then explains how the White House, in violation of the law, has bought 28 billion, "Billion with a B" in fake news.

"But the craziest, most truly unhinged conspiracy theory for the
towers falling on 9/11?" Torin asks rhetorically. "Fire." The official
story cannot be recreated by any experiment. NIST is the government agency involved in attempting to model what happened to the world trade center on 9/11, and they fail horribly. NIST never models what happens after the collapse initiation, and even what they do model before that is easily debunked. NIST created 16 separate physics programs to simulate the WTC 1 & 2 collapses and only got 1 to collapse partially. Torin adds, "When they did, [in the computer model] they removed 40% of the structural support." The cross trusses that the towers received a significant amount of their strength from had to be removed to have a collapse in the computer simulation. Torin
then mocks the official story, "There's no such thing as a  'pancake' collapse, but there is a progressive collapse"

A few slides are shown of progressive collapses throughout the world. None of them are anything like what happened to the world trade center with its pulverized concrete 100 microns or smaller just seconds after the start of collapse, and then its complete destruction. Torin uses his expertise to explain to the audience how and why a real progressive collapse occurs and subsequently why the WTC was not a progressive collapse. "The biggest problem with the argument," Torin explains. "Time."

Several slides are then presented that show the hard physics and
observed time of WTC 2 falling. Worst-case scenario would require 0.5 seconds per floor for collapse. "The absolute minimum amount of time for a progressive collapse would be 43 seconds." How long did it take for the building to fall in reality? About 8.6 Seconds.

"For the towers to fall at so close to free fall speed, over 110,000
separate and independent structural support points had to fail
simultaneously. 'Pancake theory' does NOT explain the failure of the cores." Torin explains passionately, obviously upset with the lies being told to the American people. "Nothing is holding the building up - No resistance. 110,000 structural failures at the same time."

Torin: "Nothing is holding the building up - No resistance. 110,000 structural failures at the same time."

Next, we are shown an incredible bit of detective work on Torins part. He shows a sequence of 12 different pictures of the collapse initiation of the North tower, WTC 1. Torin explains that the antenna on the top of the world trade center is a perfect guide of measurement for height, as there is a standard of changing the paint color of antennas once per fifty feet. The part of the antenna on the roof of WTC 1 appears black, then white alternated every fifty feet. There is a guide wire in the bottom left of every picture that shows that the camera does not move. Why is this picture so interesting? It shows the antenna, which is held up by the core columns, fall before the rest of the building while the fire line on the 78th floor doesn't move. Torin then goes through the hard physics of the scene we're looking at and explains how it directly contradicts the official story, "This building is not collapsing on the 78th floor. The antenna falls 56 feet before the 78th floor falls."

Torin then gives his expert analysis on building 7 for about five
minutes. For those that are new to this information, building 7 was the third building to collapse on 9/11. After a thirty second
countdown was given by firefighters, it collapsed perfectly into its
own footprint at 5:20 in the afternoon. It housed the IRS, Department of Defense, CIA, Secret Service, and the Security and Exchange Commission among many others. While I can't cover all of the hard hitting information Torin brought up about building 7, the highlight was his analysis of the collapse, which played over and over again on the screen behind him, "There is no doubt about it, this is a controlled demolition profile" then Torin directed everyone to view the kink, which is characteristic of a controlled demolition.

Dangerously high levels of asbestos, lead, PCB's, mercury, radioactive materials, and powdered concrete were in the air after the towers were demolished. Much to the surprise of many audience members, we learned from Torin that by far the most dangerous on the list was the pulverized concrete. The pulverized concrete, which was thick in the air around ground zero after the collapses of WTC 1 and 2, had a pH of 12 which is "about the same as drain cleaner." This pH level, when breathed in and gets wet in your lungs, will cause chemical burns.
"Wet concrete can burn you," Torin adds. The asbestos is bad, but that will kill you over 20 years - the powdered concrete will kill much faster. So its no surprise to learn that all of the 9/11 rescue and recovery dogs are dead.

Torins report goes on to explain how "emissions from the WTC piles were recorded to be hundreds of times above the legal Permissible Exposure Limit as established by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health for more than 2 weeks after 9/11." Sheer contempt of Christine Todd Whitman, head of the EPA is expressed next by Torin. Torin is rightly angry at her for saying the air was safe to breathe and that people should return to work, even though they refused to release the data from their testing at that time to substantiate their declaration. Torin uncovers that, "The EPA didn't begin monitoring for airborne asbestos levels until 8:00pm September 14, 2001 – a day and a half after they told everyone that it was safe to return." Torin then cites the exact law that the EPA is violating and the number of regulatory duties that are violated as well. Torin has caught the EPA in direct violation of a federal law, punishable by up to 10 years in prison as well as a $250,000 fine for each violation. Before the EPA did the tests, independent tests were done
in which the machines that do the air quality testing "were so full of junk that they couldn't be read." If that is the case, Torin adds,
"You must, by law, throw the sample out."

What was in the readable air samples? "Sampling of bulk materials and dust found generally low levels of asbestos." Since Torin has worked with hazardous materials for over 12 years specializing in asbestos abatement, he knows quite a bit about the industry. "There is no such thing as a 'low level of asbestos'. Bulk samples, by Federal law, either are (>1%) or are not (<1%) asbestos containing materials."

Bottom line, the EPA failed to perform its duties in regards to 9/11 and actively encouraged people to enter an unsafe area containing hazardous materials. As anyone working in the asbestos industry, Torin wanted to land the contract to clean the asbestos in the World Trade Center, "We all wanted the contract – you could clean a small section, sell the contract, and retire." It was known in the industry as basically a goldmine of an asbestos abatement job, a contract worth over 3 billion dollars. Instead, the owner of the World Trade Center complex, "Lucky" Larry Silverstein actually made billions through insurance purchased before the towers destruction.

A critical slide in the presentation of Rudolph Giuliani is displayed next. It should be noted that Giuliani agreed with Christine Todd Whitman that the air at ground zero was safe. Giuliani was appointed U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in 1983. "So he knew a thing or two about criminal investigation procedures," Torin adds. Knowing that, one has to wonder why he "sent more than 99% of the steel from the WTC to China and Korea in violation of proper chain of evidence." Not only that, it was sent overseas at a price undercutting a New Jersey company. A company in New Jersey offered to
pay $0.56 per ton, but it was sent out of the country to be smelted
before experts could analyze the steel for signs of explosives for
$0.50 per ton. Giuliani is clearly one of the perpetrators behind the crimes of 9/11, and he was confronted recently by a truth squad led by Luke Rudkowski. They wanted to know why his story has changed five times about his activities on the morning of 9/11.

So what does Torin think took down the WTC buildings? Different forms of thermite, such as thermate and one called super thermite. "If I was demolishing a building as high as the WTC, I would use thermite. It does what I want, when I want." Torin then gets into the science of thermite, and what its actual chemical composition is. The same chemical composition found in the previously molten metal microspheres found in the WTC dust, discovered by professor Steven Jones. "The WTC
'microsphere' samples showed the presence of aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), potassium (K), copper (Cu), and sulphur (S)."

Torins explanation continues, "The presence of sulphur in steel makes it brittle and lowers its melting point. Sulphur is NOT used in structural steel because of this. Powdered iron oxide (Fe2O4) and aluminum in equal parts make a compound called thermite. Add sulphur to thermite and you have a compound called thermate which is used in heavy demolition."

Torin then explains super thermite, "Add potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and cupric sulphide (CuSO4) to thermate and you have something called 'Super Thermite' which is explosive and used in mega-demolition, such as WTC 1 & 2." For obviously criminal reasons, "NIST refuses to comment on the presence of Al, Mg, S, K, or Cu in the samples." Torin finalizes the evidence of explosives with statements made from numerous firefighters and reporters at ground zero such as Capt. Karin DeShore of the New York Fire Department, "Somewhere around
the middle of the World Trade Center [WTC 1] there was this orange and red flash. Initially it was just one, then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode… These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building." Torin explains, "That is a controlled demolition profile she is describing."
Torin: "Save it why? Because its a demolition angle"

So who isn't wanted for the crimes of 9/11? Gasps were heard from the audience as information relating to former paid CIA operative Tim Osman having no involvement in the crimes of 9/11. Tim Osman was Osama Bin Ladens CIA codename. New evidence has been released in the past month showing how the federal government allowed planes personally chartered by none other than Osama himself to get friends and family out of the country after 9/11. A quote from Osamas FBI page shows that
he is in fact, not wanted for involvement in the crimes of that day.
Torin shows a quote from the FBI director at the time, Robert Mueller, saying that there is "no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers." Well sourced evidence is then shown from multiple mainstream news articles proving that many of the hijackers are still alive. The official story does not add up.

The strongest part of Torins presentation is saved for the end, the
aftermath of 9/11. A bleak picture is shown of the results of the
false flag attack. An invasion of Afghanistan that was on Bush's desk two days before 9/11, over 655,000 admitted dead in the spreading war in the middle east, cheap heroin out of Afghanistan that the former
Taliban government destroyed, soon to be full scale war in Iran,
several thousand dead troops, and an oppressive police state at home being enforced by some of the returning aggravated felons that were doing the same in Iraq. "We are not deprogrammed after battle," Torin explains when covering the mental aspects of war.

Torins insight as a combat nurse reveals that the actual amount of dead troops numbers around 15,000-17,000, not the 3,500 we have been told. "If you get shot in combat – Bam! Clock goes off. If you die in transit [to a hospital out of Iraq such as Ramstein in Germany] you are not an official Iraq casualty." The same holds true if the troops out of the country die 24 hours after they were hit in Iraq. The official troop death number is just those that have died in action on the ground.

We are then shown that legally, "terrorist" is a term that can be
branded on virtually anyone. "If you have ever thought of spanking
your child, running a red light, or made someone angry then, by this definition, you are a terrorist!" And if you are charged as a
terrorist, you will be tried in a military court. With the power
slanted against you in a military court, the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case showed us that you do not even have to be released if found not guilty. This is a lot to swallow when you realize that "such persons are subject to indefinite imprisonment without charges, legal representation, or any of the other protections guaranteed by the Constitution," Torins slide explains. Then the definition of domestic terrorism is shown, and we all learn that by this definition, not wearing your seatbelt, jaywalking, speeding, or spitting on the sidewalk is a terrorist act.

Fliers are shown next that originated out of the Department of
Homeland Security and the Phoenix, Arizona FBI office. These are shown to policing agencies around the country. Torin explains how nearly all of the groups encompass normal citizens who have done no wrong such as Torins favorite, "Lone Individuals - If you don't fit in any group, this is it."

After a brief question and answer, Torin ends the presentation with a fitting quote from Thomas Jefferson, "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." A true patriot and truth activist, Torin is dissenting to expose the lies and crimes of our government in order to get it back from the tyrannical, criminal group sitting in power now and to return to the Constitution and Bill of Rights. If you want to join Torin in this fight or ask him a question, he can be heard every Saturday and Sunday on the We The People Radio Network from 12 to 2 pm central.

After his radio show, you can join him in person with an Austin 9/11 truth squad, getting the word out on the south steps of the state capital on Congress avenue every Saturday. This article is only just a few highlights of Torins presentation, so don't miss the one next month at Brave New Books.

Update 7/29/2007: Download Torins Full presentation in Power Point
format here.

by Gibbwake. Gibb can be contacted at

Articles & Research By Dick Eastman

(1) Thirty pieces of silver - Darkness from the West, by Israel Shamir
(2) Cindy Sheehan brushes off ‘racist’ and ‘anti-Semite“ tags
(3) “Daryl Bradford Smith is a Pretender”

(1) Thirty pieces of silver - Darkness from the West, by Israel Shamir

From: "Israel Shamir" <>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:11:57 +0200

The ‘abusing priests’ campaign is a clear sign of forthcoming war. If the Church pays for ‘abusing priests’, maybe Jewry should pay for ‘cheating Jews’? Darkness from the West

The ‘abusing priests’ campaign is a clear sign of forthcoming war. If the Church pays for ‘abusing priests’, maybe Jewry should pay for ‘cheating Jews’?

Darkness from the West
By Israel Shamir

The Catholic Church, the biggest apostolic church in the US, is under heavy attack. The plotters had united media effort and legal machinery, utilized American obsession with money, and given the Church the treatment they gave tobacco industry, that is, suing it to oblivion. For their chance to get thirty pieces of silver (over a million dollars, in
present prices), hundreds of American Catholics denounced their church.

This attack, followed by the ill-considered surrender of Los Angeles Catholic bishops in the ‘abusing priests’ campaign, is a clear sign of forthcoming war. This soap opera had a good run in the US media before the Iraq invasion. It actually started while Sharon was besieging Bethlehem and destroying Palestine in 2002. Then, all of a sudden, hundreds of men and women in their forties had remembered that they were abused some twenty years ago. It rose to a hysterical shriek in advance of the Iraq invasion in 2003, and now it is playing again as a harbinger of new hostilities. Whenever the forces of darkness prepare a new attack on mankind, they use their considerable artillery to shut up the potential resistance forces, starting with their avowed enemy, the Church.

This was the practice of the Third Reich as well: before starting the war, they began their campaign of ‘priests as sex fiends’, to force the church’s silence. Now this is the turn of the Fourth Reich: the Church was against the war in Iraq; the Church was steadfast in her defence of Palestine; the Church is certainly against the impending attack on Iran; so she has to be put on defence. The same people who control the US media call for war with Iran, and they are behind this campaign against the Church.

Our enemies and the enemies of the Church concocted, through their control of the media, a phantom of “abusive priests” and succeeded in convincing the LA Bishops to take the bait of “final settlement”. Very soon the bishops will discover that nothing is final when you submit to their wishes. Surrender gets you nowhere. They could learn from the Germans, who agreed to settle all Jewish claims for $1 billion (as described by the chief Jewish negotiator Nahum Goldmann in his book The Jewish Paradox, New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1978), eventually paid $60 billion to find out that they still own $180 billion, and now there is a new suit to provide the children of the wartime sufferers with full coverage of their shrink sessions. If there is a sucker who agrees to pay, he won’t get a break from these fellows.

The very construction of the claim is faulty, to say the least. If a man abused a boy, while being a priest, this is still his crime, and he should bear responsibility – if and when the crime is proven by criminal court beyond any reasonable doubt. Likewise, if a man abused a boy while serving in the army, or working in the fire brigade, the responsibility is his, not of the army, nor of the fire prevention services. The bishops had no right to agree to such a suit; if an anti-Christian judge accepted such a suit, the church should rather disband than agree. The bishops are not the church, nor are the clergy: the Church is the mystic
body of all worshippers, the Bride of Christ, and she is not a subject to any suit for misdeeds of individual believers. The Church is always right, though her bishops, priests or laymen may be wrong individually.

On the second thought, this model can be useful. If one can sue the Catholic Church, certainly one should be able to sue her traditional competitor, the Jews. If the Church pays for “abusing priests”, maybe Jewry should pay for “cheating Jews”? A full list of claims by people cheated by Jewish financiers, real estate developers, bankers, insurance agents would run to trillions. One Enron case (a clear-cut case of Jewish cheating) would be enough to offset the “abusive priests” bounty.

Let them sue Jewry in the same court where the Church is sued; there are enough assets to seize from the Jewish organizations. Maybe that will leave them with less money to pour into bribing politicians and killing Palestinians.

A little bird told me that the Jews would never agree to accept
collective responsibility. They are ready to act as a collective in
order to collect, but not to pay. And until they agree to accept
collective responsibility, the Church should not either. If the Pope in Rome still holds some sway over his LA bishops, he should retire them, void the settlement, proclaim that the church will never agree to be hold responsible for any individual’s misdeed and excommunicate and anesthetist everyone who participated in this circus. Greed should not be encouraged: however right or wrong originally, by trying to destroy the church for their pecuniary gain, the claimants are totally in the wrong.

The odd custom of the late Pope John Paul II - asking forgiveness for historical sins - was liable to cause this sort of event: he was not entitled to ask such forgiveness for this would imply that every Catholic, even a five year old Brazilian girl, was guilty of mistreating the church’s enemies of some 500 years ago. The church should be mightily happy if she is not sued for the damages incurred in all the cases where her titular head has asked for forgiveness, including the Crusades, the Sack of Constantinople and the blood libel cases.

New claims will surely pour in. This is human nature: show one man of a way to get a million by saying he was fondled by a priest, and hordes will queue up with their claims. Some will be outright liars and cheats. The name of Lori Haigh comes to mind. This lady collected a $1.2 million abuse payment from the Los Angeles and Orange County Catholic archdioceses in 2002, alleging that she was abused by a clergyman while
being driven to and from music practices more than 20 years earlier. Afterwards, she tried to play an abuse victim on several other occasions, until she was stopped by police as a liar and impostor.

Others will use their false memory to make it up. False memory is a very real thing: I have noticed that I ‘remember’ events I never witnessed because I was told of them so many times. It calls for quite an effort to regain one’s true memory and to dismiss the false one. Every Jerusalemite will tell you of horrors of 1948 siege of the city, but the newspapers of the time witness that there was no siege at all, as an Israeli historian Dr Uri Milstein recently proved.

Sex cases generate a lot of claimants. A few years ago, a Sephardic Jew, General Itzik Mordechai got close to receiving the crown of Israel’s Prime Ministership. The ruling Ashkenazi elite did not cherish the idea.

They found a girl who claimed that she was raped by the lusty General. After the claim was publicized, dozens of women came up with similar claims. The claims came to naught, but there was enough dirt to bury Mordechai’s chances to govern. The trick was repeated against the Sephardi President Moshe Katzav and worked: the first claimant failed, but the police could find some positive evidence out of the dozens who came to claim.  In the US, the waves of would-be claimants rise to tsunami heights, with hundreds and thousands coming to claim they were abused – in average, 20 years ago, in some cases 40 years ago.

I do not feel sorry for these late claimants. Why did they wait for 20 years? If a boy or a girl is being attacked, he or she may scream and run to parents or to police. If they did not do it, just forget it. Consider it a clumsy pass, an unpleasant experience, a result of misunderstanding. Blame yourself for indecisiveness. Proceed with your life. Join mankind: every one of us, even your mommy and daddy, suffered an unwanted kiss or an undesired embrace. The laws should be reasonable, - allowing 20-year old claims for such events is not reasonable. Only an immediate complaint should be considered valid, and 24 hours is as long
as should be allowed, in some extreme cases.

If a crime occurred, the criminal should be punished, but the denouncer may not profit by his report of the crime. This is the necessary rule of justice. Otherwise we are back at the time when a denouncer could claim a third of denounced man’s property. An honest abuse victim should kick the temptation offered by the US legal system which encourages suing for huge sums of money, and return his winnings to the church. Anyway only the lawyers, the Dershowitzes, win. Out of billions collected by the
Jewish lawyers on behalf of the holocaust survivors, hardly a drop
reached actual ex-prisoners, while the rest remained in the lawyers’ coffers.

Expensive damage suits are immoral and counterproductive. A woman collecting a million for being burned by hot coffee in McDonalds, a man collecting a million for smoking too much, - this is just an incitement to litigate. Lawyers’ fees should be capped to the extent of a working man’s salary, so they could not turn justice into roulette. The Americans may consider revamping their legal system for it is a travesty of justice: the US judges have refused every claim by tortured Palestinians, but have awarded Israel and American Jews with billions of Palestinian or Iranian moneys.

The rest of the world lives well without these enormous damage suits. Money is only money, and this pursuit of dollars is extremely
unattractive. Freud considered money to be the psychological equivalent of shit. Babies do show their feces with the same pride grown-ups flash their gold ringlets. An Arab book of seventh century tells of shit competition between two tribes, where the winner is one who produces the biggest pile. This is probably a better and a saner way of competing than the one offered by the Forbes.


The Americans over-simplify the question of sex with minors, when they present it as something monstrous. This is not so. Are you revolted by Romeo and Juliet? As a good American citizen, you should be; Juliet was 14, and thus Romeo today would be tried and locked up as a “paedophile”, together with his accomplice the good Friar Laurence, in the United
States. Friar Laurence would surely be considered as an “abusing priest”, and a Dershowitz would collect a million from the Verona diocese for his sin of arranging the lovers’ tryst. Not only the lovers from Verona: Edgar Allan Poe married a 14-year old; and if the present laws were in force, the American poet would hearken to his Raven’s “nevermore” in jail. Prophet Muhammad married a nine year old Aisha, but Jacob, a Biblical patriarch, bettered him and married Rachel who was 7.
In modern world, Jacob and Muhammad would be hunted down, extradited and jailed. It is possible that even better placed persons would not fare well facing our most enlightened justice: the Mother of our Saviour was just 14 at Annunciation…

Mature women ready to share their experience with young boys were always approved. In the Greek classic book Daphnis and Chloe, two young shepherds find love (they would be imprisoned in the US), but before that, an experienced and mature lady Lycaenion taught young Daphnis how to attend to his girlfriend – to their mutual satisfaction. Nowadays, in
England, a 26-year old woman teacher was persecuted for having sex with her 15-year old pupil. Even the prosecutor admitted that it’s “every schoolboy’s fantasy to have that kind of attention from a young, attractive member of staff”, but pushed for conviction all the same. In the US, Pamela Rogers was sentenced to many years of jail for having sex with a young boy as tall as you and me, who was full 13 at the act – the
age my great-grandfather was successfully married. If Mrs Rogers would rather abuse and humiliate the boy, she could have a successful career in the school. Who knows, she could become even a State Secretary…

A man who maims or kills a child will go to jail, serve his time and go out a free man. A man who had sex with a 14-year-old girl will serve his time and will be placed on a roll of sex offenders; his name and address are made available to every Internet user. In the UK and the US, these neo-liberal transatlantic twins, a special service allows you to locate every sex offender in your vicinity. The state in these super-liberal countries is a Peeping Tom who allows the pursuit of happiness in the stock market only.
The Americans and the Brits invented a silly concept of “statutory rape” as if a state prosecutor knows better than boys and girls what they want. The great French thinkers Sartre and Derrida, Foucault and de Beauvoir, called in 1977 for skipping this legal invention altogether. Wise Spaniards established the age of consent at 13, while the even wiser Muslims have no such age limit for marriage at all, while disapproving of extramarital relations. Equally wise Jews were guided by the Talmud which stipulates the permitted age of marriage for girls at ‘three years and one day’ (though the safer age of nine was preferred),
while strictly forbidding sodomy.

Indeed, almost all cases of alleged abuse are homosexual; the alleged victims should sue the gay rights organizations rather than the Church. But the Church is not allowed even to utter these words. They can’t say “pederasty”, they should pretend this is “pedophilia”. They may not defrock a homosexual priest, for they would be attacked for their “homophobia”. In the US, the strong defiance of homosexuality is inbuilt
into their official dogma. The taboo on “being less than fond of
homosexuals” (homophobia) may stand next to the taboo on “being less than fond of Jews” (anti-Semitism).  These two taboos are so well entrenched in the US, that even mentioning them became a taboo, and two secondary offences have been created, “racism”, an anti-Semitism
spill-off, and “pedophilia”, a homophobia spill-off.

In Israel we feel there is no better way to show allegiance to American democracy and liberalism than to emasculate the man and de-womanize the woman. In our smaller Jewish state, in Israel, things have changed since the macho days of Six Day War, when homosexuality was banned, the one-eyed Defense Minister Dayan screwed every female conscript and the
Israeli army kicked three Arab armies in a week. Now the gay tendency is no snag, ministers are sued for kissing a girl, and the army is beaten up by a few bearded Lebanese. Once Israeli girls served in the army as non-combatants. Their main job was to look smart and cheerful, and thus encourage the boys to fight well. Now they follow the example of Judith and Jael, don helmets, do combat duty and look like East German swimmers
on anabolic steroids.

After ending her tour of duty, with scalps of Palestinians at her belt (instead of  their foreskins, as was Samson’s wont) this new breed of a female sabra is unsuitable for normal mating; and she ends up in the growing lesbian colony of Tel Aviv. While male homosexuals are often meek, the females have a drive for leadership and they lead the majority of gay organizations.

Tsippi Livni, the Foreign Minister and an ex-Secret Service agent, allegedly has some lesbian background, and thus
she passed millions of dollars to gay organisation led by her patriotic sisters. Traditionally over-independent, Jewish women became even more so as they now serve in the combat units, earn as much as men do, are protected from a flirtatious look by ever-alert police. They grew balls and became like men but even more so, encouraged by the movies showing decisive executive women and wimpy, obedient, good-for-nothing and admiring men.

The men got the message. If the girls are as hard as boys, but more demanding and more likely to sue – who needs them? Some statistics claim 20% of Tel Aviv is homosexual, others quote even higher numbers. Gays and lesbians have full rights: they adopt children, their “marriage” is recognized if performed abroad, they inherit, they are positively
discriminated in favour of as employees and tenants, for they have more disposable income and do not become pregnant. They are quite patriotic: a leading gay poet of Tel Aviv called on Israel to erase Gaza and Beirut, and break Arab skulls. They insist on their right to serve in the occupation army. They derive an extra benefit from the occupation: cheap young Arab bodies. Well-to-do gays shack up with a boy who escapes
the blockade and deprivation of refugee cap, and the authorities do tolerate this breach of apartheid, though an across-the-barriers union of man and woman is not tolerated.

A similar process takes place in the larger Jewish state, the US. Girls are being pushed into military service, they become hard as nails; and as a result, more and more men turn to other men, and naturally to younger men, or boys. Priests are probably no exception. The ultimate guilt is not that of the church, but of the feminist and lesbian movement which supports women’s military service; and of the media that promotes this attitude.

Now, sexual violence towards a small boy or girl by an adult man is a repulsive and criminal act, but this is extremely infrequent. One can stretch it a bit and agree that this is quite a repulsive act even if no violence is used, though one should be aware that this is a question of culture rather than an invariably correct judgement.


We can’t remain indifferent to the travail of the Church for she has a potential to change the US from the predatory neo-Judaic state it is today into a peace-loving Christian one. Her bishops went too far trying to accommodate their enemy, but they have discovered now that this way leads to perdition. Next time they may be braver, if there ever is a next time. We should defend her against these attacks whether in the “abusive priests” cases, or in the insinuations regarding the late pope Pius and the German Reich. Only the innocent and gullible will try to
ponder the hard facts behind the setup, for there are none relevant.

This is all hype, as Philip Jenkins, an Episcopalian Professor of
History and Religious Studies at Penn State University, proved in his book Pedophiles and Priests, while the name of Pope Pius was exonerated many times over.

The latter accusation is a mirror image, or a parody of the accusation of Caiaphas just as the Holocaust religion is a parody of the Christian faith. In the Christian dogma, Caiaphas gave Christ into the hands of the Romans to be crucified, and this implied the inherent hostility of the Judaic leadership and priesthood to the Christ. In the Holocaust dogma, Pope Pius surrendered the Jews to the Germans, affirming the
eternal enmity of the Holocaustians to the Church. It does not matter that on a factual level, the accusations have been refuted many times over. Our tenacious enemy never gives up, never acknowledges his defeat, never accepts the facts unless they suit him.

Who is the enemy? Some people refer to the Israel Lobby with their great control over media. In the famed tract, they were called the Elders of Zion. Others call them Illuminati. I called them the Masters of Discourse, the operators of the integrated machine of public disinformation and indoctrination, from the Wall Street Journal to the Wikipedia. Thousands of networks, newspapers, journals, books, films and ideas are being united and guided by their invisible hand, while free thought still survives in the far reaches of the web. The fearsome AIPAC is just the visible tip of the iceberg, below which are miles and miles of solid ice: media lords, chief editors, their pundits – in short, the Masters of Discourse. Their power base is in the media, in their ability to create a false presentation of reality and mislead people. Recently John Pilger described it as The Invisible Government.

When the Masters of Discourse fought against Communism, they had a few faked ‘facts’ they were never tired of brushing up. They played with stupefying numbers: Communists killed thirty, no, fifty, no, sixty million, though the freely available demographic figures of the Soviet Union made it as miraculous as feeding of the multitudes by five loaves. They invented Soviet anti-Semitism, though Soviet government and security always had a lot of Jews in high places. They invented Soviet totalitarianism, though the Soviet people freely supported their government. Instead of the Holy Grail, they had Raul Wallenberg, who was supposed to have survived miraculously and to have been kept in some far-away jail. No research would ever move them to recognize their
inventions for being what they were, namely, lies.
Now they want to destroy Iran and cripple Russia, for these lands did not forget God. They do fight against the Church, against every church, be it Communism or Islam or Orthodox Judaism, or their traditional enemy, the Apostolic Church, for every church defends its flock against their robbery and resists their dark drive for domination. The church affirms the primacy of spirit, and of the godlike nature of man; this is anathema to the Masters. On a deeper level, the Church is their main adversary, for they are a competing church of sorts, the church of darkness, and they will not suffer a competitor.

Dominant as they are, they are not omnipotent. We should not be afraid of them. There is no magic in their incantations. They have no divine powers behind them. They are impostors. They exploit the old myths of mankind, forgetting that nothing works without God. The Masters are twins to Zionists; the Zionists decided to arrange for Israel’s return to the Promised Land as it was promised to their fathers. However, that return was to be done by God; while humans trying to do God’s work are necessarily rebels. Wannabe demiurges, they created their hellish regime
ruled by their security forces, and destroyed the lovely land of
Palestine. The result was so miserable, that Zionist prince Avrum Burg recently advised his countrymen to obtain a foreign passport and emigrate.

The Masters of Discourse are trying to create a pseudo-Judaic universe on a planetary scale. Their vision was grotesquely presented by the authors of the Protocols, but the reality they brought in is as unsuccessful as the one their brethren established in Palestine. The same rule of security forces, the same fear-mongering, the same ideological vise, the same destruction of nature, the same impoverishment of spirit, the same uprooting, the same discrimination, the same endless wars, - all quite removed from the Prophetic promises
they tried to emulate.

As rebels against God, they will be defeated. As charlatans they will be dismantled. Their fall is imminent. But it won’t happen without our hard work, without our understanding being widely spread and generally understood. We should reject them completely, as completely as we are called to in our confession of faith.


The Church is the mightiest tool for peace. The Church may yet lead us to peace – if we would vocally support her. With massive support of people united around the Church, the Middle East wars would become history. The Americans may look eastward for an example. While the biggest apostolic church of America is being bled for money, in the East there is a great upheaval of spirit. In Turkey, after 80 years of materialist dictatorship, people turned to God and voted for a party of faith. The same thing happened in Palestine, in the Lord’s Land, where
Hamas won the elections. Everywhere in the East, from Cairo to Moscow, the East sheds the pragmatic cold shackles of godless regimes and turns to God.

The Americans may emulate this current. The Church – the Catholic one and her Orthodox sister – is the Islam of the West, and it is meant to be a compliment. There is positively a place for a Catholic Hamas rising in the US and changing the rules of the game, taking away the rule from the laic twins of Republicans and Democrats. If Islam succeeded in regaining its place of respect and glory in the recently and violently anti-religious society of Ataturk, if the Orthodoxy made it in Lenin’s land, the Christian Church may achieve the same in the US, by siding with people, and the people can defeat their enemy, by siding with the

The abusing priests’ case may eliminate the Catholic Church in the US altogether as an independent force: already five dioceses have declared bankruptcy. But the Church still may overcome: she can divest of all its property and transfer it to the local parishes, remove the collaborationists and survive -- poor, lean and fighting, as she did in the days of the Apostles. She should not surrender but meet the challenge. She can lead America to peace and prosperity as the great positive moral force, she can demand from the Bush administration that America get out of Iraq now. If the church will become more active in the struggle for peace, she would attract more people. Yet, a new independent and autocephalous Church of America could spring forth from
the American Apostolic Churches, the Orthodox and the Catholic, and her light would defeat the darkness of apostasy.

Alas, some of our friends fail to understand it and join in the attack on the Church. It is as if an infantry soldier were to join in the enemy attack on his tanks, just because he hates tankers.

The flagship of pro-Palestinian media is Counterpunch. This is one of the biggest friendly sites, and they do publish many articles produced by our friends. But in Counterpunch, one can’t say a good word about the Church, and for sure one can’t mention Christ.

A Google search for “church” on their site shows that they are as harsh to the Church as the
Jerusalem Post.  See for instance;

Recently they published a piece by a Badruddin Khan who did not stop at repeating brazen lies: “These hoary tactics were applied by Christians against Jews barely a century ago. The Catholic Church issues circulars that condemned Jews for using the blood of Christian children for Passover rites. All Jews (whether secular, converts, or intermarried) were marked and identified as sinister and worthy of apartheid. This state of apartheid allowed the organized evil of the Holocaust to be

This is a lie and calumny one finds only in the cheapest Zionist
textbooks. As a matter of fact, the Jewish converts were invariably well received by the church, and some of them rose within its ranks. The list would be too long, from St Paul and St Peter to St John of Cross and St Teresa of Avila to the leading bishops in the French church and elsewhere. The church indeed condemned those Jews who used the blood of Christian children for Passover rites or for any other purpose; would Badruddin Khan prefer her to approve of this unorthodox practice? And
finally, the reference to the holocaust is absurd. Hitler’s regime was as violently anti-Catholic as any. They actually pioneered the “abusive priests” line copycatted by today’s American media. I have no doubt that Counterpunch would never dare to publish similar offensive lies about the Jews, but the Church may be attacked freely.

Our good combatants Bill and Kathy Christison went to demonstrate in front of a Catholic cathedral because of Prof Finkelstein’s refused tenure, as they wrote in the Counterpunch. I asked them, why they didn’t go to demonstrate in front of a Jewish institution, be it a synagogue or a Bnai Brith lodge or the ADL. They replied that “You are quite correct when you say that in the US it’s possible to be anti-anything except anti-Jewish or anti-Israel. The Israel lobby is so very strong and wields so very much political power that no politician, no commentator dares criticize Israel without fear of being labeled anti-Semitic and excluded from mainstream discourse.  In the wake of the Holocaust (about
which the lobby constantly reminds us), few people want to risk being thought anti-Jewish, so this is a powerful weapon, and becomes more and more powerful as time goes on.”

Demonstrating in front of a Catholic church is like looking under the lamp post for lost coin, which you have actually lost in the dark. It’s dark in front of the Jewish establishments, but we should venture into darkness to bring light. This is the way of our organisation, Deir Yassin Remembered who regularly demonstrate in front of synagogues. And in front of the cathedrals, we should demonstrate in support of the
Church, not against her.

The Catholic Church is one of the greatest champions of Palestine. They have a Palestinian Patriarch, they do defend Palestine. All established churches support Palestine; with the apostolic churches taking the leading role, and the Catholics often lead them all. During the 2002 Bethlehem siege by the Jews, the Catholic Church led the actions and I participated in them (read ) I am not a Catholic, actually I belong to the competing native sister, the Orthodox Church of Holy Land, but in some ways, the Catholic Church is even more supportive of Palestine than our own.

Bill and Kathy disagreed: “The Catholic Church has certainly done some good things for the Palestinians, but not nearly enough. Where has the church been while Israel oppresses Christians, including Catholics, in Palestine?  Have we heard any protests from this Pope over the walling in and devastation of Bethlehem, or from the last Pope when Israel besieged the Church of the Nativity during the 2002 reinvasion of the
West Bank?  Where was the Church when Israel ethnically cleansed numerous Christian Palestinian villages in 1948?  And indeed, where has the Church been as Israel has oppressed members of another faith, Muslims, for 60 years, desecrating Muslim places of worship and killing and ethnically cleansing Muslim people--for the sole reason that they are not Jews?”

I replied: The Catholic Church is doing as much as she can, but she can’t do much, two hundred years after Voltaire. You ask, “Where has the church been while Israel oppresses Christians, including Catholics, in Palestine?” Forgive me, but it reminds me the standard Jewish line of “Where has the church been during the holocaust?” Stalin was more realistic when he noticed that the Pope has not too many divisions. Actually, the Church protested every Israeli crime. The Church could do more if she were not constantly attacked by the Jewish Lobby - and by the well-meaning people who do not understand that they undermine this
defence of Palestine.

Once, the Church led the Crusade to liberate the Holy Land. Now, she can lead the Crusade of Peace for the same purpose.

By Israel Shamir

(2) Cindy Sheehan brushes off ‘racist’ and ‘anti-Semite“ tags

Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:27:03 -0700
From: Jeff Blankfort

"Now, incredibly, I am being accused of being a racist (as is Ray
McGovern) for demanding that Congressman John Conyers do his job. When I think of the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, I don't think of a black man, I think of a legislator that should do his/her job, whatever color their skin is."

Cindy Sheehan: Justice Should be Color-Blind

Submitted by BuzzFlash on Wed, 07/25/2007 - 2:36pm. Guest Contribution

by Cindy Sheehan

Journey for Humanity and Accountability, Day 16

Justice should be color-blind, but we all know that it still is not.

Historically, there are many cases, perhaps thousands if not millions, disputing the blindness of justice; but when I think about this contradiction, a few cases jump to my mind.

The incident in Georgia where the young man was given a 10-year prison sentence for consensual sexual contact between minors is one example. 

Paris Hilton got a slap in the wrist for breaking parole, but she's
white and rich. White, rich people rarely have to pay for their crimes.

Black people in New Orleans were shot or arrested for "looting" after Katrina and when white people did the same thing, they were only trying to "survive."

Mexican illegal immigration is now being blamed for all of our economic woes in America when the blame lies with the military industrial war economy and entities such as Wal-Mart sending our jobs and manufacturing to Asia. The Irish and Chinese were blamed in previous times of economic challenges.

Now, incredibly, I am being accused of being a racist (as is Ray
McGovern) for demanding that Congressman John Conyers do his job. When I think of the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, I don't think of a black man, I think of a legislator that should do his/her job, whatever color their skin is.

Why does everything have to be divided along lines in this country? As Rev. Yearwood (who is black and is also challenging Rep. Conyers to do his job). We need to look at the human and not their political party, religion, color, or economic status.

When I have challenged George Bush, does that make me a self-hating Caucasian? When I challenge Nancy Pelosi for her seat in Congress, does that make me a female chauvinist pig?

Bringing up the race issue in this case is irrelevant and sleazy. It's
like being labeled an anti-Semite because one is against the policies of Israel toward Palestine, or being called anti-American because we are against the anti-humanitarian policies of the Bush regime.

I have stood with Cynthia McKinney when she was up for re-election because I believe she is a woman of principle, even when it wasn't popular to do so. I have stood and been a guest of other members of the Black Caucus in Congress because we all stand for peace. I believe the Democrats used the anti-war left of which I am a leading member to regain both houses of Congress and many, including John Conyers, appeared at events and in photos with me, and to know label this a "white activist" vs. black man is further proof of this exploitation of
the anti-war movement.

It is not personal or racist for me with Rep. Conyers. I think the white power elite who has always had the say and authority to enforce or disobey laws at will and has a monopoly about what happens politically in this country since people with my indoor sexual plumbing weren't allowed to vote and people with the color of John Conyers' skin were only counted as 3/5s of a person, need to finally be brought to justice.

There has never been an equality of justice in this country. No one in the Bush regime has ever had to be held to account for the death and destruction they have caused. Their domestic politics have left every child behind, but particularly in disadvantaged communities where we all know there is an inherently racist poverty draft.

Rep. John Conyers was not targeted for the color of his skin, but for his betrayal of the American public and the Constitution. No matter what color they are, the Bush Crime mob needs to go to prison and no matter what color he is, John Conyers needs to do his job. When does having a thirst for justice and a yearning for peace make one racist? When the country is run by the Orwellian Rove masters, I guess.

(3) “Daryl Bradford Smith is a Pretender”

From: Jeffery Cole
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:32:17 -0500

 How can Zionists take control of the USA? - Daryl Bradford Smith

I think Daryl Bradford Smith is a Pretender. How do we know that HE is not a product of his own words. "Trust nobody?" Well, if Mr. Smith believes that we should take a cynical approach to everyone who says they are a freedom fighter, a truth teller, then, I would start with him.

My goodness, how absurd can a person get and be taken serious? Call me gullible, but I have always given every person I meet my trust until they give me a reason not to trust them. Then, if they violate that trust, they must earn it through repentance. If everyone listened to the Daryl Smiths of the world, NOTHING would get done. Frankly, if there is anyone I will not give my trust to is someone who says "trust none."

I suppose that would make me a Zionist, right Mr. Smith? Bah! Humbug!

Comment (Peter M.):

I’ve been around these debates for years now, and I think there’s
another explanation.

Many people just don’t know about the power of the Jewish lobby.

Take Eric Hufschmid. He knows about it now; but when he made his video
on 9/11, he didn’t know. That’s why there’s no mention of the Five
Dancing Israelis, of Urban Moving Systems, or of the Odigo text messages warning of the disaster BEFORE it happened.

A person who homes in on Zionism as a factor, is likely to find it hard to discuss this topic with the many “political virgins” out there. And therefore tends to mix with those of like mind. It’s easier.

But it’s dangerous. One becomes impatient with those who can’t “see”. One overstates one’s case, allowing others to spot errors which discredit it. One descends into name-calling those who disagree.

This forum breaks out of that mould, because of the diverse range of viewpoints of the participants.

Virtually all US Presidents are Freemasons; JFK is the only recent exception I know of. Couple this with the Eye on the Great Seal of the United States, and a rival theory, that of Illuminati control, has credibility too. One that carries no stigmas or penalties. It does not lead to ostracism or unemployment.

To argue for Zionist control, one therefore needs to show how it
includes the Freemasons, uses them, is superior to them. This requires a more elaborate theory.

There are many times when I receive antagonistic emails, to which I feel like replying immediately, when in an emotional state.

But I force myself to delay, to do other things until I have calmed
down, and can write a rational reply.

By such means, discussions continue rather than being terminated. Sometimes the outcome is quite beneficial, in that both participants discover common ground.

I think that many people who fall out on the internet, do so for lack of etiquette. They have never learned good manners. As a result, minor differences become magnified, and molehills become impassible barriers.

I am not saying this in a boastful way. I have just told how I have to
struggle to contain my own emotions at times.

Anyway, such an interpretation of the fallouts between those on the same side, leads me to try to stay on good terms with as many as I can, looking for merit, the half-full glass rather than the half-empty one.

Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296  Mirror:   I use the old Mac OS; being